El caso Couso
Cable en el que el fiscal general considera que el caso "no llegará a ninguna parte"
El embajador se reúne con Conde-Pumpido después de que el Supremo ordene la reapertura de la investigación
| ID: | 94177 |
| Date: | 2007-01-26 13:51:00 |
| Origin: | 07MADRID141 |
| Source: | Embassy Madrid |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Dunno: | 05MADRID4308 06MADRID3013 07MADRID101 07MADRID141 07MADRID26 07MADRID82 |
| Destination: | VZCZCXRO9639 PP RUEHAG RUEHROV DE RUEHMD #0141/01 0261351 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 261351Z JAN 07 FM AMEMBASSY MADRID TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1709 INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY RUEHGB/AMEMBASSY BAGHDAD PRIORITY 0133 RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY RUCAACC/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY RUCNFB/FBI WASHDC PRIORITY RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC PRIORITY |
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 MADRID 000141 SIPDIS SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/24/2017 TAGS: PREL, MARR, SP SUBJECT: SPAIN/COUSO CASE: AMBASSADOR MEET WITH ATTORNEY GENERAL REF: A. MADRID 101 B. MADRID 82 C. MADRID 26 D. 2006 MADRID 3013 E. 2005 MADRID 4308 Classified By: DCM Hugo Llorens; reasons 1.4 (B) and (D) 1. (C) Summary. The Ambassador and DCM met with Spanish Attorney General Candido Conde Pumpido on January 25 to review the USG's concerns with the direction of the Jose Couso case and to inquire how the Spanish Government plans to respond to recent judicial developments (REFS A, B, C, D). The Ambassador underscored that the primary motivation of his inquiry was to protect the rights of the three U.S. servicemen named in the Couso case, since the matter had already been properly investigated by the USG. Among other issues, the Ambassador raised a January 22 fax from the magistrate handling the Couso case to the Embassy's Consular Section requesting the Embassy's assistance in obtaining "complete identifying" information regarding the three U.S. servicemen named in the case. The magistrate's fax, which did not come in the required format for a Mutual Legal Assistance (MLAT) request, was leaked by "judicial sources" just hours after it was sent to the Embassy. Press coverage indicates the magistrate's request was intended to help him win Interpol's agreement to publish the Spanish international detention order. The Ambassador told Conde Pumpido that the Embassy did not intend to respond to the magistrate's fax. 2. (C) Attorney General Conde Pumpido (strictly protect) emphasized that while there was nothing the Spanish Government could do to control the actions of the judiciary, the National Court prosecutors would continue to oppose the detention orders against the three U.S. servicemen, as well as any effort to embargo USG assets in connection with the case (REF B). Conde Pumpido warned that he expected the magistrate to continue to issue requests to the USG and to seek media coverage of his efforts, but said he expected the case to "go nowhere." He said he understood that the USG did not intend to respond to Spanish judicial requests with additional information, but suggested that even a perfunctory reply would undermine the magistrate's contention that the USG had been unresponsive to his requests. Conde Pumpido confirmed that the magistrate could not independently issue a bilateral request to the USG for the extradition of the three U.S. servicemen, since such a request would have to be approved by the Spanish Government. Separately, Legal Attache Madrid has learned of reluctance at Interpol to publish the Spanish detention order (Red Notice) for the U.S. servicemen named in the Couso case, based on Interpol provisions barring involvement in activities of a "political, military, religious, or racial character." Our sense is that there is still far to go in this matter and that the Spanish Government will search for a way to quietly terminate the case on technical grounds, while hoping to avoid a direct confrontation with the Couso family. End Summary. //MAGISTRATE WORKING THE MEDIA// 3. (SBU) On the morning of January 22, the Locally Employed Legal Adviser in the Consular Section received a fax from National Court Examining Magistrate Santiago Pedraz requesting the Embassy's assistance in obtaining identifying data for the three servicemen named in the Couso case (a copy of this document was e-mailed to L and EUR/WE). It did not come through the official channels for an MLAT request and did not make clear precisely what information was being requested. Mission personnel opted not to respond to the fax, nor seek clarification from Judge Pedraz or request that he send his request through appropriate channels. Later on January 22, a press article in the wire service "Europa Press" citing judicial sources reported that Judge Pedraz had sent this request to the Embassy in order to help him meet an Interpol requirement that he provide "complete identifying data" for the accused in order for his Red Notice requests to be published by Interpol. Post's analysis is that Judge Pedraz sent this request without the expectation of a USG response, but with the intention of demonstrating in the media that he was acting expeditiously in this case. 4. (SBU) An unofficial translation of Judge Pedraz's fax follows: MADRID 00000141 002 OF 003 BEGIN TEXT Prior Correspondence 99/2003-10 To: Maria Angeles Sebastian, Legal Advisor to the Embassy of the United States of America in Spain This Court is undertaking judicial actions to investigate the circumstances and suspects in the death of Spanish journalist Jose Couso Permuy on 8 April 2003 in Baghdad, (and) as part of this investigation it has been decided to send you this note in order to obtain through your channels the complete identification of the following U.S. servicemen: - Sergeant THOMAS GIBSON, member of Company "A" of the 64th Armored Regiment, Third Armored Infantry Division of the United States Army; - Captain PHILIP WOLFORD, in command of Company "A" Armored Unit of the 64th Armored Regiment, Third Armored Infranty Division of the United States Army; - Lt. Colonel PHILIP DE CAMP, in command of the 64th Armored Regiment, Third Armored Infantry Division of the United States Army. Madrid, Monday 22 January, 2007 Magistrate Santiago Pedraz Gomez END TEXT. //MEETING WITH ATTORNEY GENERAL// 5. (C) Attorney General Conde Pumpido accepted the Ambassador's invitation to meet informally on January 25 to discuss a range of bilateral issues. The Ambassador thanked Conde Pumpido for his visit in late 2005 (REF E) to suggest an approach that would allow the National Court to dismiss the case. He noted that it had been difficult for the USG to comply with the suggestion but that we respected Conde Pumpido's advice and were pleased by the dismissal of the case by the National Court. Now that the case had been remanded by the Spanish Supreme Court, the Ambassador said that he wanted to learn from Conde Pumpido the full range of possible outcomes in this case, with the understanding that the USG's primary motivation was the protection of the three U.S. servicemen unjustly accused of murder and war crimes. The Ambassador said that the USG report on the incident, which had been shared with the Spanish Government as early as August 2003, demonstrated that a thorough investigation had been undertaken by the USG and that the matter was closed. He said that the USG was also puzzled by Judge Pedraz's fax to the Consular Section and by its immediate release to the media, which suggested that Judge Pedraz did not intend to deal seriously with this sensitive case. The Ambassador said that the Embassy did not intend to respond to Judge Pedraz's fax, nor did we seek for his request to be reissued through proper MLAT channels. 6. (C) Conde Pumpido emphasized that the Spanish judiciary was entirely independent and that the decision by the Supreme Court and the actions of Judge Pedraz were beyond the ability of the Spanish Government to control. The prosecutors now had no choice but to deal with the case. However, he said that the National Court prosecutors remained convinced that Spain did not have jurisdiction to try this case and that the elements of the case should not lead to a trial. He expressed the conviction that the case "would go nowhere." Conde Pumpido drew attention to the request by Judge Pedraz to the National Court prosecutors to examine the possibility of placing an embargo (freeze) on USG assets as part of any civil component to the Couso case. He said the prosecutors would oppose any such request to embargo USG assets. (COMMENT: This implies that the prosecutors would appeal Judge Pedraz's motions to the appellate section of the National Court, which is the body that dismissed the Couso case in March 2005. END COMMENT). With regard to the unusual fax from Judge Pedraz, Conde Pumpido said that it was his understanding that it was related to Pedraz's efforts to comply with Interpol's technical requirements- ut said h did nnt thifk0tHa4 the Nthonal Coert 0rosecutors were even MADRID 00000141 003.2 OF 003 aware of the fax. 7. (C) Conde Pumpido cautioned that his experience with Judge Pedraz led him to believe that the magistrate would continue to issue judicial requests and demands to the Embassy, and that he would probably continue dealing with the press. Conde Pumpido reiterated that there was nothing the Government could do to rein in Pedraz. He suggested that it might be advisable for the Embassy to transmit a perfunctory response to undermine the magistrate's contention that the USG was being unresponsive to Spanish judicial requests. Asked whether Pedraz had the ability to directly issue a bilateral request to the USG for the extradition of the three U.S. servicemen, Conde Pumpido said that Pedraz could not do so because any such request would have to go through the Government (COMMENT: Conde Pumpido did not guarantee that the Spanish Government would deny an extradition request, so we will remain attentive to this possibility. END COMMENT). //RELUCTANCE BY INTERPOL TO ISSUE DETENTION NOTICE// 8. (C) Separately, Legat Madrid learned through informal inquiries that there is great reluctance at Interpol to publish the Red Notices for the three U.S. servicemen, as requested by Judge Pedraz. The Interpol contact said that the Secretary General was aware of the request and would do his best not to publish the request on the grounds that it would violate Article 3 of the Interpol Constitution and General Regulations, which states that "It is strictly forbidden for the Organization to undertake any intervention or activities of a political, military, religious, or racial character." He indicated that if the requests were to go forward, Interpol would bring together the Spanish and U.S. representatives for consultations and that the matter would be voted upon by the Interpol Executive Committee, and then by the Interpol General Assembly. (COMMENT: This information is reassuring, but we remain concerned that Judge Pedraz could frame his request in a manner that makes it more difficult for Interpol to reject, or that he could simply go around Interpol and distribute the detention orders internationally on his own. END COMMENT). //COMMENT// 9. (C) This appears to be the start of a lengthy process, and one that will be increasingly politically sensitive for the Zapatero Government. Spanish judicial officials do not/not believe this case will prosper based on the available evidence and they not want this case to obstruct increasing cooperation between USG and Spanish judicial officials. However, it is clear from discussions with both the Attorney General and the Chief Prosecutor of the National Court that the prosecutors not entirely certain how to proceed not that Spanish jurisdiction has been established by Spain's Supreme Court. Our sense is that they will continue to seek procedural/technical grounds for getting the case dismissed, without having to directly and publicly challenge the Couso family (which has already accused prosecutors of working to defend USG interests). Our objective remains the dismissal of this case so that the three U.S. defendants will no longer face prosecution for a matter that has already been investigated and brought to a conclusion by the USG. Aguirre |
Traduce este documento »
Traducción automática. Puede que el texto traducido no sea fiel al original
Tu suscripción se está usando en otro dispositivo
¿Quieres añadir otro usuario a tu suscripción?
Si continúas leyendo en este dispositivo, no se podrá leer en el otro.
FlechaTu suscripción se está usando en otro dispositivo y solo puedes acceder a EL PAÍS desde un dispositivo a la vez.
Si quieres compartir tu cuenta, cambia tu suscripción a la modalidad Premium, así podrás añadir otro usuario. Cada uno accederá con su propia cuenta de email, lo que os permitirá personalizar vuestra experiencia en EL PAÍS.
En el caso de no saber quién está usando tu cuenta, te recomendamos cambiar tu contraseña aquí.
Si decides continuar compartiendo tu cuenta, este mensaje se mostrará en tu dispositivo y en el de la otra persona que está usando tu cuenta de forma indefinida, afectando a tu experiencia de lectura. Puedes consultar aquí los términos y condiciones de la suscripción digital.
