Cable en el que la embajada plantea volver a tratar el asunto con La Moncloa
Se plantea el compromiso de evitar la percepción pública de que EE UU está presionando al Gobierno para que interfiera en el proceso
| ID: | 95857 |
| Date: | 2007-02-08 18:12:00 |
| Origin: | 07MADRID215 |
| Source: | Embassy Madrid |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Dunno: | 06MADRID3013 07MADRID101 07MADRID141 07MADRID26 07MADRID82 |
| Destination: | VZCZCXRO2262 PP RUEHAG RUEHROV DE RUEHMD #0215/01 0391812 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 081812Z FEB 07 FM AMEMBASSY MADRID TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1808 INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY RUEHGB/AMEMBASSY BAGHDAD PRIORITY 0140 RUEHLA/AMCONSUL BARCELONA PRIORITY 2428 RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC PRIORITY RUCNFB/FBI WASHDC PRIORITY RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY RHMFIUU/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY |
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 MADRID 000215 SIPDIS SIPDIS EUR/WE FOR ALLEGRONE, CLEMENTS, AND CERVETTI L/LEI FOR KEN PROPP AND MARK KULISH CA/OCS/CI E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/05/2017 TAGS: PREL, MARR, CJAN, KJUS, SP SUBJECT: SPAIN/COUSO CASE: JUDGE THREATENS TO OBSTRUCT US-SPAIN JUDICICIAL COOPERATION REF: A. MADRID 141 B. MADRID 101 C. MADRID 82 D. MADRID 26 E. 2006 MADRID 3013 MADRID 00000215 001.2 OF 004 Classified By: DCM Hugo Llorens; reasons 1.4 (B) and (D) 1. (U) Summary. Spanish media reported February 5 that National Court Examining Magistrate Santiago Pedraz has threatened to request the suspension of US-Spain judicial cooperation agreements because the USG has not responded to his out of channel January 22 request for "complete identifying information" for the three U.S. servicemen named in the Couso case (REF A). The reports made clear that Judge Pedraz required specific identifying data in order to process international detention orders through Interpol. Judge Pedraz instructed Spanish National Police and the Civil Guard to work with Interpol to determine the full identities of the accused servicemen. In response to a media inquiry on Judge Pedraz's request, the Embassy Spokesperson stated that the USG had undertaken an investigation of the incident in 2003 and that the results of that investigation had been shared with the appropriate Spanish authorities. Separate news reports covered the February 5 meeting of the Couso family with Minister of Justice Aguilar, who promised to adhere to legal norms and to National Court orders related to the case. The Couso family urged the Spanish Government to pressure the USG to respond to Mutual Legal Assistance (MLAT) requests related to the Couso investigation. In a more positive development, Judge Pedraz agreed with a National Court prosecutor's report that USG assets in Spain could not/not be frozen as part of the civil component of the Couso family suit against the three U.S. servicemen. 2. (C) Since regaining control of the investigation in December, Judge Pedraz has elected to draw as much media attention as possible to his actions in the case and appears determined to keep this matter on the front burner. Our assessment is that Judge Pedraz is driven in part by his frustration with USG refusal to recognize his jurisdiction in the matter, and in part by his desire to avoid blame for his inability to successfully prosecute this case. This assessment is bolstered by the comment of a "Reporters Without Borders" contact, who told the Embassy Media Relations Officer of rumors in the NGO community that Judge Pedraz had sent the request to the Embassy for the identities of the U.S. servicemen purely as a "publicity stunt." Although we are undergoing a period of tension with Spanish judicial authorities stemming from friction over unrelated judicial cooperation cases, we do not anticipate that Spanish officials will give any consideration Pedraz's suggestion to suspend bilateral cooperation. In this message, we consider possible USG responses to developments in the Couso case and request the Department's guidance as to how the Mission should proceed with Spanish authorities on this issue. End Summary. //JUDGE THREATENS TO OBSTRUCT JUDICIAL COOPERATION// 3. (U) Spanish daily "El Pais" reported February 5 that the USG had "refused to provide the National Court the identities of the U.S. soldiers who killed (Spanish cameraman) Jose Couso." The story indicated that, as a result of the USG's "refusal," Judge Pedraz intends to ask the Criminal Section of the National Court and the main administrative body of the Spanish courts to suspend implementation of Spain's bilateral Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty with the U.S. The El Pais story confirmed earlier reports that Judge Pedraz required the "complete identities" of the three accused servicemen in order to obtain Interpol's approval of his international detention orders for the three servicemen. The El Pais story reported that Judge Pedraz had issued a "written request" to the Embassy ten days earlier for the identities of the accused (REF A) and claimed that a clerk in Pedraz's court had followed up with a phone call to the Embassy on January 31. (COMMENT: Pedraz's "written request" did not come in the MADRID 00000215 002.2 OF 004 proper format for a judicial cooperation request, but rather as an informal fax to the Consular Section. We have no knowledge of a second contact by Pedraz's staff in relation to this case. END COMMENT). Judge Pedraz also ordered the National Police and the Civil Guard to work through Interpol to obtain the identities of the U.S. servicemen, a strange request given that Interpol asked Judge Pedraz to provide that very same information. An El Pais reporter had contacted the Embassy Media Relations Officer on January 31 to inquire about Judge Pedraz's request. Per previous guidance in the Couso case, the Embassy Spokesperson responded that the USG had undertaken an investigation of Jose Couso's death in 2003, concluded that the U.S. personnel involved had acted within the rules of engagement, and conveyed its report on the incident to the appropriate Spanish authorities. 4. (SBU) Judge Pedraz told El Pais that, in the absence of a response from the USG, he would "study the possibility" of recommending to the National Court and to the administrative body that oversees the Spanish judicial system (Consejo General del Poder Judicial) that Spain suspend implementation of U.S.-Spain bilateral judicial cooperation agreements. However, Judge Pedraz subsequently told another news service that he did not intend to make such a recommendation "for the moment." In the El Pais article, an unidentified Spanish judge asserted that Spanish judges "respond cordially and with alacrity" to "dozens" USG MLAT requests on issues ranging from narcotics traffickers to Nigerian fraud rings and that the lack of a USG response in this case was unacceptable. (COMMENT: Legat has sought for some time, without success, to convince Judge Pedraz to treat the hundreds of ongoing Nigerian fraud cases involving Amcits as organized crimes cases rather than as individual cases of common crime, since it would simplify prosecution to treat fraud perpetrators as members of a crime ring. END COMMENT). //"REPORTERS WITHOUT BORDERS" CLOSELY TRACKING COUSO CASE// 5. (SBU) A representative of the NGO "Reporters Without Borders" (RSF) contacted the Embassy Media Relations Officer on February 7 to inquire about the El Pais story and about the direction of the Couso case. The RSF representative pointedly asked whether Judge Pedraz had made his request to the Embassy for the identities of the three U.S. servicemen through the correct channels, or by some informal means. She said, with a note of irritation, that it was RSF's understanding from unspecified sources that Judge Pedraz had sent the request to the Embassy as a "publicity stunt" and was not handling the Couso case as a serious judicial matter. Emboff responded that we were not aware of any formal MLAT request for the full identities of the U.S. servicemen and added that bilateral judicial cooperation remained healthy and was working to the benefit of both countries. //JUDGE PEDRAZ DISCOUNTS FREEZING OF USG ASSETS// 6. (U) In a separate decision, Judge Pedraz accepted the conclusions of a report he had commissioned from the National Court prosecutors regarding the viability of freezing U.S. Department of Defense assets in Spain as part of the civil component of the Couso case (REF B). Pedraz agreed with the prosecutors that such assets "cannot be embargoed (frozen) because they are inextricably linked" to the USG's implementation of its foreign policy and that seeking to freeze these assets would constitute "interference in the sovereign actions of another state." He cited the prosecutors' finding that U.S. diplomatic and consular assets in Spain were similarly immune from being embargoed. Judge Pedraz added that the freezing of Department of Defense assets would also violate bilateral judicial assistance agreements between the U.S. and Spain. //PLAINTIFFS MEET WITH MINISTER OF JUSTICE// 7. (U) Also on February 5, the family of Jose Couso met with outgoing Minister of Justice Juan Fernando Lopez Aguilar to MADRID 00000215 003.2 OF 004 request a "firm gesture" on the part of the Spanish Government in response to the "attitude demonstrated by the U.S. Administration" regarding this case. The Couso family suggested that the Spanish Government call in Ambassador Aguirre to demand an explanation of the USG's actions in this case. Lopez Aguilar assured the family that the Spanish Government would "respect the law and any decisions rendered by the National Court." In subsequent comments to the media, Javier Couso, brother of Jose Couso, said that the family took the Minister's response to indicate that the Spanish Government would support a bilateral extradition request to the U.S. for the three accused servicemen if such a request were submitted by a National Court judge. Post previously inquired about the possibility of a bilateral extradition request in a meeting with the Chief Prosecutor of the National Court, who said the Spanish Government has not taken a position as yet regarding whether it would support a bilateral extradition request (REF B). //FRICTION ON OTHER CASES// 8. (C) We do not believe Spanish officials will contemplate disrupting bilateral judicial cooperation over the Couso matter, but note that this threat is being raised in the context of Spanish Ministry of Justice displeasure regarding a perceived lack of USG cooperation on recent unrelated Spanish judicial assistance requests. In the Carrascosa parental abduction case, in which a Spanish citizen mother is being held on contempt charges by a New Jersey state court, Spanish judicial authorities believe U.S. and New Jersey court officials have not given sufficient weight to a determination in the case by a Spanish judge. Separately, MOJ officials believe the USG was not helpful in responding to detention requests in the case of former Guatemalan Interior Minister Donaldo Alvarez, who resided illegally in the U.S. for several years and who faces criminal charges in Spain. While delays and miscommunications on judicial cooperation cases are caused primarily by differences in the Spanish and U.S. legal systems, delayed U.S. responses on MLAT requests or rejection of MLAT requests on technical grounds generates a sense among Spanish officials that the USG is not fully committed to a reciprocal cooperative relationship. 9. (C) These factors are not directly relevant to the Couso case, in which we do not recognize the Spanish court's jurisdiction, but they do color public discussion of the Couso case, where the absence of a USG response to the Spanish court is portrayed as a case of U.S. disrespect for the Spanish legal system. Complicating the issue further is the intense disapproval by the Spanish public of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, which for some makes the indictment of the three U.S. servicemen in the Couso case an indictment of the "illegal" war itself. The plaintiff's attorneys are aware of this dynamic and charge that the lack of a USG response to judicial requests is a further indication of USG "arrogance," requiring a strong official response by Spanish authorities. The challenge for the Spanish Government and the prosecutors is to appear both responsive to the plaintiffs and Judge Pedraz (and respectful of the victim, Jose Couso) while avoiding a confrontation with the USG over a case that has a very weak legal basis. //NEXT STEPS// 10. (C) As noted in previous reporting, the Mission's goal is dismissal of this case to ensure that the three U.S. servicemen are not negatively affected by ongoing Spanish judicial actions. A mere suspension of the case in the absence of the accused (a politically palatable solution for both the judges and the Government) would be insufficient as it would leave the servicemen open to future legal action in Spain or internationally. We would appreciate the Department's views on the following range of options for USG actions in this case: - We could continue to ignore requests from Judge Pedraz, and MADRID 00000215 004.2 OF 004 refuse to recognize his fax of January 22 requesting assistance in identifying the three servicemen. - The Embassy could respond to Judge Pedraz with a fax from the Embassy, stating either that any judicial assistance request should go through official channels, or referring Pedraz to the Ministry of Justice for the official USG response on this case. We are aware that informing Judge Pedraz to present requests through normal channels could trigger a formal MLAT requesting the identities of the three U.S. servicemen; the Ambassador has made clear to the Attorney General that we would not welcome such an MLAT request. - The Ambassador could raise this to higher political levels (Minister of Justice and/or Vice President Maria Teresa Fernandez de la Vega) and reiterate that no further USG response will be forthcoming. As in past communications on this issue with Spanish authorities, we would engage on an informal basis to avoid any public perception that we are exerting pressure on the Zapatero Government on this issue or encouraging them to interfere in the judicial process. - The Department could raise this case in Washington with the Spanish Embassy to convey concern regarding the press reports that Judge Pedraz is threatening to recommend the suspension of legal cooperation with the USG over this matter. 11. (C) A final alternative is to do nothing for the moment and await further developments. The Spanish Government is aware of our position and we do not believe that the courts or the Government would seriously consider disrupting judicial cooperation over this matter. However, as noted above, Judge Pedraz appears motivated to keep this case in the public eye -- or at least to avoid blame for the eventual failure of the case to progress -- so we anticipate further efforts by him to force a USG response to his requests. Among the next logical steps would be a bilateral request by Judge Pedraz for the extradition of the three accused servicemen, at which point the National Court prosecutors would have to choose between processing the extradition requests and risking a dispute with the USG, or appealing the extradition requests at the cost of accusations that they were acting to protect USG interests. The Criminal Section of the National Court dismissed the Couso case in March 2006 on jurisdictional grounds and expressed skepticism regarding the merits of the case, but there is no guarantee that they would render a favorable verdict again if the case is appealed for their determination. Aguirre |
Traduce este documento »
Traducción automática. Puede que el texto traducido no sea fiel al original
_
